A self-reflection on providing companionship through supervision approaches of postgraduate students in geography

Adeline Ngie

Abstract


Postgraduate education is often perceived to take place on some independent level by the student in doing most of the required work in upgrading skills and knowledge. At the same point there is need of guidance through one or more persons usually called ‘supervisor’ or ‘promoter’. During this guidance to develop knowledge and skills, relationships are established which can either challenge the people involved to grow or break down. Through the Personal Construct Theory, this paper undertakes a self-reflection within the field of Geography to understand how the various supervisory approaches can provide companionship support to students. The experiences of these approaches in higher education around other universities were also reviewed towards providing companionship for the students. The outcome shows that approach to supervision is hardly a one-size fit all scenario and certainly requires flexibility in handling the supervision process. Some approaches like the collective or collaborative or group approach certainly provide a sense of companionship in the postgraduate journey than the one-on-one approach. However, the one-on-one approach is chosen by some supervisors and students to avoid conflicts from multiple inputs, but the latter can set up a research group that still offers the sense of companionship required by students. Therefore, whatever the choice students or supervisors make, needs to consider the aspect of companionship for a holistic journey of learning.

Keywords


education, postgraduate, supervision, geography, companionship

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agné, H. and U. Mörkenstam, 2018: Should first-year doctoral students be supervised collectively or individually? Effects on thesis completion and time to completion. Higher Education Research & Development 37(4), 669-682. DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2018.1453785

Bitzer, E.M. and R. Albertyn, 2011: Alternative approaches to postgraduate supervision: A planning tool to facilitate supervisory processes. South African Journal for Higher Education 25(5), 874-888.

Busetto, L., Wick, W. and C. Gumbinger, 2020: How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological Research Practice 2, 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z

Chowdhury, M. F., 2014: Interpretivism in aiding our understanding of the contemporary social world. Open Journal of Philosophy 4, 432-438. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2014.43047

Daniels, S., and C. Nash, 2004: Lifepaths: Geography and biography. Journal of Historical Geography 30, 449-58.

Darling, L. A. 1985: What do nurses want in a mentor? Journal of Nursing Administration 14(10), 42-4.

Fenge, L-A., 2011: Enhancing the doctoral journey: the role of group supervision in supporting collaborative learning and creativity. Studies in Higher Education 37(4), 401-414. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.520697

Fraser, R., and A. Mathews, 1999: An evaluation of the desirable characteristics of a supervisor. Australian Universities' Review 42(1), 5-7.

Hockey, J., 1994: Establishing boundaries: problems and solutions in managing the PhD supervisor's role. Cambridge Journal of Education 24(2), 293-305.

Mouton, J., 2001: How to succeed in your master's & doctoral studies. Pretoria: Van Schaik. Eliaeson, S., 2002: Max Weber’s Methodologies. Cambridge: Polity.

Elwood, S., 2002: GIS and collaborative urban governance: Understanding their implications for community actions and power. Urban Geography 22, 727-59.

Gadamer, H. G., 1970: On the scope and function of hermeneutical reflection. Continuum 8, 77-95.

George, K., and E. Stratford, 2005: Oral history and human geography. In I. Hay (Ed.) Qualitative research methods in human geography. 106-15. South Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.

Goodson, I., 2006: The rise of the life narrative. Teacher Education Quarterly 33(4), 7-21. http://www.teqjournal.org/Back%20Issues/Volume%2033/VOL33%20PDFS/33_4/07goodson-life-33_4.pdf

Goodson, I., Biesta, G. J. J., Tedder, M. and N. Adair, 2010: Narrative learning. London: Routledge.

Herman, L. and A. Mandell, 2004: From teaching to mentoring: principle and practice, dialogue and life in adult education. London: Routledge Farmer.

Hockey, J., 1994: New Territory: problems of adjusting to the first year of a social science Ph.D. Studies in Higher Education 19(2), 177-190.

Hutchings, M., 2017: Improving doctoral support through group supervision: analyzing face-to-face and technology-mediated strategies for nurturing and sustaining scholarship. Studies in Higher Education, 2015 42(3), 533-550. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1058352

Kelly, G., 1955: The psychology of personal constructs Vol. I, New York, W. W. Norton & Co., Inc.

Kivunja, C. and A.B. Kuyini, 2017: Understanding and Applying Research Paradigms in Educational Contexts. International Journal of Higher Education 6(5), 26-41. URL: https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n5p26

Kwan, M. and G. Ding, 2008: Geo-Narrative: Extending Geographic Information Systems for narrative analysis in qualitative and mixed-method research. The professional Geographer 60(4), 443-465 DOI: 10.1080/00330120802211752

Lee, A. and R. Dunston, 2011: Practice, learning and change: towards a re-theorisation of professional education. Teaching in Higher Education 16(5), 483-494.

Lee, A., 2007: Developing effective supervisors: concepts of research supervision. South African Journal of Higher Education (21)4, 680-693.

Mohajan, H. K., 2018: Qualitative research methodology in social sciences and related subjects. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People 7(1), 23-48.

Mouton, J., Boshoff, N., and M. James, 2015: A survey of doctoral supervisors in South Africa: leading article. South African Journal of Higher education 29(2), 1-22.

O’Niel, S. M., Schurink, W. and K. Stanz, 2016: The benefits of using small supervisor-initiated groups to supervise master’s research. South African Journal of Higher Education = 30(4), 210-230.

Parker, S., 1997: Reflective teaching in the postmodern world: a manifesto for education in postmodernity, Philadelphia, Open University Press.

Pearson, M., 1996: Professionalising PhD education to enhance the quality of the student experience. Higher Education 32(3), 303-320.

Polkinghorne, D. E., 1988: Narrative knowing and the human sciences. Albany, NY. State University of New York Press.

Robertson, M. J., 2017: Team modes and power: Supervision of doctoral students. Higher Education Research & Development 36(2), 358-71.

Samara, A., 2006: Group supervision in graduate education: A process of supervision skill development and text improvement. Higher Education Research & Development 25(2), 115-129.

Schulze S., 2012: Empowering and disempowering students in student-supervisor relationships. Koers 77(2), 1-8.

Schwandt, T. A., 2005: Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications.

Schwandt, T., 2005: On modelling our understanding of the practice fields. Pedagogy, Culture & Society 13(3), 313-332.

Smit R., 2010: Doctoral supervision: facilitating access to a community of research practice. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. 14(2), 96-109.

Stracke, E., 2010: Undertaking the journey together: Peer learning for a successful and enjoyable PhD experience. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice 7(1), 1-10.

Thaba-Nkadimene, K. L., 2020: A reflective essay on experiences and practices of postgraduate supervision in the University of Limpopo: A life history approach. Journal of African Education 1(3), 5-25.

Ungadi, B.A. 2021: Challenges in doctoral supervision in South African Universities. Open Science Journal 6(2) 1-24.

Walker, G., Golde, C. M., Jones, L., Bueschel, A. C., and P. Hutchings, 2008: The Formation of Scholars: Rethinking Doctoral Education for the Twenty-First Century. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Walsham, G., 1995: The emergence of interpretivism in IS research. Information Systems Research 6, 376-394. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.4.376

Wichmann-Hansen, G., Thomsen, R. and H. M., Nordentoft, 2015: Challenges in collective academic supervision: Supervisor’s experiences from a master programme in guidance and counselling. Higher Education 70, 19-33.

Willinsky, J., 1989: Getting personal and practical with personal practical knowledge. Curriculum Inquiry 19(3) 247-264.

Winchester, H.P.M. and M.W. Rofe, 2016: Qualitative research and its place in human geography In I Hay (Ed.) Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography, 4th Ed. Oxford University Press: Toronto.

Wisker, G., Robinson, G. and M. Shacham, 2007: Postgraduate research success: Communities of practice involving cohorts, guardian supervisors and online communities. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 44(3), 301-320.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.23954/osj.v9i2.3512

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Open Science Journal (OSJ) is multidisciplinary Open Access journal. We accept scientifically rigorous research, regardless of novelty. OSJ broad scope provides a platform to publish original research in all areas of sciences, including interdisciplinary and replication studies as well as negative results.