Money, a disconnecting agent: Reminders of money trigger a feeling of disconnection which increases the likelihood of unethical decisions.

Chris Macdonald

Abstract


For eons many have hypothesized the corrupting influence of money, and yet, there has been a great void in the way of empirical experimentation. However, a series of pioneering experiments has begun to show confirmation of previous assumptions, one of which showed that the mere thought of money can loosen morals. This paper reveals three new experiments that explore the underlying process of this phenomenon. The results of experiments 1 and 2 suggest that individuals primed with money are less ethical than both a control group and individuals primed with business-related concepts. Further questioning revealed that an underlying mechanism behind the unethical decisions may be a decreased feeling of human connection. In accordance with this finding, the results of experiment 3 demonstrate that priming with disconnection themes directly results in a greater likelihood of unethical decisions.


Keywords


Money, Ethics, Morality, Connection, Environmental cues, Human connection, Disconnecting agents, Psychology, Alienation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Avalos H. 2005. Fighting Words: The Origins of Religious Violence. New York: Prometheus. 40

Bald M. 2014. Literature Suppressed on Religious Grounds. New York: Facts On File. 13

Blanco C, Grant J, Petry NM, Simpson HB, Alegria A, Liu SM, Hasin D. 2008. Prevalence and correlates of shoplifting in the United States: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC). Am J Psychiatry 165:(7) 905–13

Callero PL. 2013. The myth of individualism: how social forces shape our lives, 2nd edn. New York: Rowman & Littlefield. 29

Canto 12. The Bhūmi-gītā. Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, SB 12.3.41

Cordry HV. 2015. The Multicultural Dictionary of Proverbs. North Carolina: McFarland & Company. 179

Dibble BJ. 2012. Comprehending the Climate Crisis. Bloomington: iUniverse Inc. 79

Digha Nikaya 1. Brahmajāla Sutta. DN 1

Dreber A, Johannesson M. 2008. Gender differences in deception. Economics Letters, Elsevier 99:(1) 197–199

Ecclesiastes 5:10. The Holy Bible.

Ecclesiastes 5:13. The Holy Bible.

Franke GR, Crown DF, Spake DF. 1997. Gender differences in ethical perceptions of business practices: A social role theory perspective. The Journal of Applied Psychology 82: 920–934

Gandhi S S. 2007. History of Sikh Gurus Retold: 1469 - 1606. New Delhi: Atlantic Publishing. 187

Giddens A. 1990. The consequences of modernity. California: Stanford University Press.

Gino F, Pierce L. 2009. The abundance effect: Unethical behavior in the presence of wealth. Organizational Behaviour Human Decision Processes 109:(2) 142–155

Gino F, Mogilner C. 2014. Time, Money, and Morality. Psychological Science 25:(2) 414–421

Goodwin N, Nelson JA, Harris J. 2009. Macroeconomics in context. London: M. E. Sharpe. 387

Gorman EJ. 2008. Fire Mission. Illinois: Red Dessert Press. 161

Harari YN. 2014. Sapiens: A brief history of humankind. London: Vintage Books. 208

Jiang Y, Chen Z, Wyer SW. 2014. Impact of money on emotion expression. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 55, 228–233

Johns A, Slemrod J. 2010. The Distribution of Income Tax Noncompliance. National Tax Journal 63:(3) 397-418

Kay AC, Wheeler SC, Bargh JA, Ross L. 2004. Material priming: The influence of mundane physical objects on situational construal and competitive

behavioral choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 95: 83–96

Kets de Vries MFR. 2009. Sex, Money, Happiness, and Death: The Quest for Authenticity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 103

Kouchaki M, Smith-Crowe K, Brief AP, Sousa C. 2013. Seeing green: Mere exposure to money triggers a business decision frame and unethical outcomes. Organizational Behaviour Human Decision Processes 121:(1) 53-61

Kray LJ, Haselhuhn MP. 2012. Male pragmatism in negotiators’ ethical reasoning. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 48:(5) 1124-1131

Lewicki RJ, Robinson R. 1998. Ethical and unethical bargaining tactics: An empirical study. Journal of Business Ethics 17: 665–682

Marx K. 1844. The economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

Matthew 19:24. The Holy Bible.

McCabe DL, Treviño LK. 1995. Cheating among business students: A challenge for business leaders and educators. The Journal of Management Education. 19:(2) 205–218

Mogilner C. 2010. The pursuit of happiness: Time, money, and social connection. Psychological Science 21: 1348–1354

Percy R, Timbs J, Limbird J. 1840. The mirror of literature, amusement, and instruction. London: J. Limbird. 156

Piff PK, Stancato DM, Côté S, Mendoza-Denton R, Keltner D. 2012. Higher social class predicts increased unethical behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109:(11) 4086–4091

Reutner L, Wänke M. 2013. For my own benefit or for the benefit of others: Reminders of money moderate the effects of self-related versus other-related persuasive arguments. Social Psychological and Personality Science 4: 220–223

Timothy 6:9. The Holy Bible.

Timothy 6:10. The Holy Bible.

Vohs KD, Mead NL, Goode MR. 2006. The psychological consequences of money. Science 314: 1154–1156

Vohs KD, Mead NL, Goode MR. 2008. Merely activating the concept of money changes personal and interpersonal behavior. Current Perspectives in Psychological Science 17:(3) 209

Vohs KD. 2015. Money Priming Can Change People's Thoughts, Feelings, Motivations, and Behaviors: An Update on 10 Years of Experiments. Journal of experimental psychology General 144:(4) e86-e93

Wang L, Malhotra D, Murnighan J K. 2011. Economics education and greed. The Academy of Management Learning and Education 10: 643–660

Wang L, Murnighan JK. 2014. Money, Emotions, and Ethics Across Individuals and Countries. Journal of Business Ethics 125: 163




DOI: https://doi.org/10.23954/osj.v4i1.2200

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Open Science Journal (OSJ) is multidisciplinary Open Access journal. We accept scientifically rigorous research, regardless of novelty. OSJ broad scope provides a platform to publish original research in all areas of sciences, including interdisciplinary and replication studies as well as negative results.