How do complex phenotypes evolve? Solving the “gene for X” problem with atavisms, homeosis, and other evo-devo surprises

Alexander J Werth

Abstract


Helping students learn how major phenotypic shifts evolve is a major hurdle for biology educators. Fortuitously, teachers can exploit the oft-misunderstood “gene for X” concept to explain how evolution, and complex phenotypes, often turn on single changes to regulatory genes governing expression of structural genes during development. This explains how one gene can make a big difference, and relates microevolution relates to macroevolution, a frequent hang-up for evolution deniers. Although complex traits such as intelligence do not derive from a single gene, minor tweaks in gene regulators produce atavisms (sudden appearance of “throwback” features), homeotic mutants (whose altered features stem from shifts in developmental timing and location), and other major changes in organismal morphology. Biology educators must explain how evo-devo mechanisms profoundly shift the course of evolution and drive phenotypic change. An adult form does not evolve into another, but underlying development readily evolves.

Keywords


evo-devo; atavism; homeosis; development; phenotype; plasticity

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bishop D (2010) Where does the myth of a gene for things like intelligence come from? The Guardian, 9 September 2010.

Dougherty MJ (2009) Closing the gap: inverting the genetics curriculum to ensure an informed public. American Journal of Human Genetics 85(1):6-12.

Dougherty MJ (2010) Moving beyond the basics: teaching the genetics of complex traits. Journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants 23(5):65-66.

Eldredge N, Gould SJ (1972) Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism. In: Schopf, TJM (ed) Models in Paleobiology, pp 82-115. San Francisco: Freeman.

Freitas R, Gómez-Marin C, Wilson JM, Casares F, Gómez-Skarmeta JL (2012) Hoxd13 contribution to the evolution of vertebrate appendages. Developmental Cell 23(6):1219-1229.

Goldschmidt RB (1940) The Material Basis of Evolution. New Haven: Yale Univ Press.

Gould SJ (1977) Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.

Gould SJ (1980) The Panda’s Thumb: More Reflections in Natural History. New York: Norton.

Gould SJ, Vrba E (1982) Exaptation: a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 8(1):4-15.

Greene E (1989) A diet-induced polymorphism in a caterpillar. Science 243(4891):643-646.

Haeckel, E (1866) General Morphology of Organisms: General Foundations of Form-Science, Mechanically Grounded by the Descendance Theory Reformed by Darwin. Berlin: Reimer.

Hall BK (1995) Atavisms and atavistic mutations. Nature Genetics 10(2):126-127.

Johnson NA, Lahti DC, Blumstein DT (2012) Combating the assumption of evolutionary progress: lessons from the decay and loss of traits. Evolution: Education and Outreach 5:128-138.

Kampourakis K, Minelli A (2014) Understanding evolution: why evo-devo matters. BioScience 64(5):381-382.

Lineweaver CH, Bussey KJ, Blackburn AC, Davies PCW (2021) Cancer progression as a sequence of atavistic reversions. BioEssays, https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.202000305.

Martin M, Courtier-Orgogozo V (2017) Morphological evolution repeatedly caused by mutations in signaling ligand genes. In: Sekimura T, Nijhout H (eds) Diversity and Evolution of Butterfly Wing Patterns, pp 59-87. Singapore: Springer.

Ohsumi S, Kato H (2008) A bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) with fin-shaped hind appendages. Marine Mammal Science 24(3):743-745.

O’Riordan K (2012) The life of the gay gene: from hypothetical genetic marker to social reality. Journal of Sex Research 49(4):362-368.

Osterauer R, Marschner L, Betz O, Gerberding M, Sawasdee B, Cloetens P, Haus N, Sures B, Triebskorn R, Köhler HR (2010) Turning snails into slugs: induced body plan changes and formation of an internal shell. Evolution & Development 12(5):474-483.

Portin P, Wilkins A (2017) The evolving definition of the term ‘gene.” Genetics 205(4):1353-1364.

Van Valen L (1973) Festschrift. Science 180:488.

Weiner J (1994) The beak of the finch: a story of evo

lution in our time. New York: Knopf.

Werth AJ (2009) Clearing the highest hurdle: human-based case studies broaden students’ knowledge of core evolutionary concepts. The Journal of Effective Teaching 9(2):37-52.

Werth AJ (2012) Avoiding the pitfall of progress and associated perils of evolutionary education. Evolution: Education and Outreach 5(2):249-265.

Werth AJ (2013) An evolutionary focus improves students’ understanding of all biology. Reports of the National Center for Science Education 33(1):1-18.

Werth AJ (2014) Vestiges of the natural history of development: historical holdovers reveal the dynamic interaction between ontogeny and phylogeny. Evolution: Education and Outreach 7(12):1-11.

Werth AJ (2020) Cetaceans as exemplars of evolution and evolutionary ecology. Oceans 1(2):56-76.

Werth AJ, Shear WA (2014) The evolutionary truth about living fossils. American Scientist 102(6):434-443.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.23954/osj.v6i4.2978

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Open Science Journal (OSJ) is multidisciplinary Open Access journal. We accept scientifically rigorous research, regardless of novelty. OSJ broad scope provides a platform to publish original research in all areas of sciences, including interdisciplinary and replication studies as well as negative results.