Publishing scientific articles in the digital era

Mario Pagliaro


In the digital era in which over 4 billion people regularly access the internet, the conventional process of publishing scientific articles in academic journals following peer review is undergoing profound changes. Following physics and mathematics scholars who started to publish their work on the freely accessible arXiv server in the early 1990s, researchers of all disciplines increasingly publish scientific articles in the form of freely accessible and fully citeable preprints before or in parallel to conventional submission to academic journals for peer review. The full transition to open science, I argue in this study, requires to expand the education of students and young researchers to include scholarly communication in the digital era.


scientific publishing; scientific journals; scholarly publishing; scientific papers; open science; scientific articles

Full Text:



Clement, J. Worldwide digital population as of July 2020,, 24 July 2020. (accessed August 10, 2020).

Ginsparg, P. Preprint Déjà Vu. EMBO J. 2016, 35, 2620-2625.

Abdill, R.J.; Blekhman, R. Meta-Research: Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints. eLife 2019, 8:e45133.

Demma Carà, P.; Ciriminna, R.; Pagliaro, M. Has the time come for preprints in chemistry? ACS Omega 2017, 2, 7923-7928.

ChemRxiv dashboard, (updated on August 8, 2020):

van Dijk, D.; Manor, O.; Carey, L. B. Publication metrics and success on the academic job market. Curr. Biol. 2014, 24, R516-R517.

Fraser, N.; Momeni, F.; Mayr, P.; Peters, I. The effect of bioRxiv preprints on citations and altmetrics. bioRxiv 2019, 673665.

Brown, H. History and the Learned Journal. J. Hist. Ideas 1972, 33, 365–378.

Hunter, M. Promoting the new science: Henry Oldenburg and the Royal Society. Hist. Sci. 1988, 26, 165-181.

Enago Academy, The World of Academic Publishing, May 21, 2018. See at the URL: (accessed August 10, 2020).

International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers, The STM Report, 5th edition, 2018; p.5. (accessed August 10, 2020).

MDPI, History of MDPI, 2020. (last accessed August 10, 2020).

Larivière, V.; Haustein, S.; Mongeon, P. The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era. PLoS ONE 2015, 10 (6): e0127502.

PLOS. Publication Fees, 2020. (accessed Augusty 10, 2020).

DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals., 2020. (accessed July 27, 2020). Caveat: the Directory does not differentiate between no APC and a current 100% discount, which is how many OA journals actually enter the market, waiving fees for the first year or two.

ACS Publications. ACS Omega, Overview, 2020. (accessed August 10, 2020)

Wiley. Advanced Science, Article Publication Charges, 2020. (accessed August 10, 2020).

Bartling, S.; Friesike, S. Towards Another Scientific Revolution, in Opening Science, S. Bartling and S. Friesike (Ed.s), Springer, Berlin: 2014; pp.3-15.

Giles, J. PR's 'pit bull' takes on open access. Nature 2007, 445, 347.

Stellingwerff, T. Twitter, August 15, 2019. (accessed August 10, 2020).

Wicherts, J.M.; Kievit, R.A.; Bakker, M.; Borsboom, D. Letting the daylight in: reviewing the reviewers and other ways to maximize transparency in science. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 2012, 6:20.

Green, T. Is open access affordable? Why current models do not work and why we need internet-era transformation of scholarly communications. Learn. Publ. 2019, 32, 13-25.

RSC Publishing, Chemical Science, 2020. (accessed August 10, 2020).

Larivière, V.; Kiermer, V.; MacCallum, C.J.; McNutt, M.; Patterson, M.; Pulverer, B.; Swaminathan, S.; Taylor, S.; Curry, S. A simple proposal for the publication of journal citation distributions. bioRxiv 2016, 062109.

McKiernan, E.C.; Schimanski, L.A.; Muñoz Nieves, C.; Matthias, L.; Niles, M.T.; Alperin, J.P. Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations. PeerJ Prepr. 2019, 7:e27638v2.

Ross, H. Citation Bribery. Chem. Eur. J. 2019, 25, 13449-13451.

Chua, S.K.; Qureshi, A.M.; Krishnan, V.; Pai, D.R.; Kamal, L.B.; Gunasegaran, S.; Afzal, M.Z.; Ambawatta, L.; Gan, J.Y.; Kew, P.Y.; Winn, T.; Sood, S. The impact factor of an open access journal does not contribute to an article's citations. F1000Res. 2017, 6:208.

Kirkham, J. J.; Penfold, N.; Murphy, F.; Boutron, I.; Ioannidis, J.P.A.; Polka, J.K.; Moher, D. A systematic examination of preprint platforms for use in the medical and biomedical sciences setting. bioRxiv 2020.04.27.063578.

Ref.11, p.10.

Walter, Mullins, D. From symbiont to parasite: the evolution of for-profit science publishing. Mol Biol Cell. 2019, 30, 2537–2542.

From France’s ANR through US-based NIH, a list of selected agencies accepting preprints in the proposals is available online at

Rowan, M.A. Are Editors Real People?, 20th IUPAC International Symposium on Organometallic Chemistry Directed Towards Organic Synthesis – OMCOS 20, Heidelberg, 21-25 July 2019.

Suffice it to mention here Rothenberg’s and Lowe’s ‘Write it Right’ workshop on writing research articles, funding proposals and technical reports offered at the University of Amsterdam since 2002:

Harzing, A. W. Publish or Perish. Tarma Software Research, Melbourne, 2010.

Ciriminna, R.; Pagliaro, M. On the use of the h-index in evaluating chemical research, Chem. Centr. J. 2013, 7:132.

Carrigan, M. Social media for academics, SAGE Publications, London, 2016.

Mewburn, I.; Thompson, P. Social media and academic publishing in The BERA/SAGE Handbook of Educational Research, Wyse, D.; Selwyn, N.; Smith, E.; Suter, L.E. (Ed.s), SAGE Publications, London, 2017; pp. 998-1016.

Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition, Author Rights: Using the SPARC Author Addendum, 2019. See at the URL:

Clarke, M. Revisiting: Why Hasn’t Scientific Publishing Been Disrupted Already?, The Scholarly Kitchen, October 26, 2016. (accessed August 10, 2020).

Mullis, K.B. The Polymerase Chain Reaction, Nobel Lecture, December 8, 1993. (accessed August 10, 2020).

Mullis, K.B.; Faloona, F.A. Specific synthesis of DNA in vitro via a polymerase-catalyzed chain reaction. Methods Enzymol. 1987, 155, 335-350.

Rynasiewicz, R.; Renn, J. The turning point for Einstein's Annus mirabilis. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. B 2006, 37, 5-35.

Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R. Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references. arXiv 2014, 1402.4578.

Laurillard, D. Rethinking Teaching for the Knowledge Society, Educause Rev. 2002, 37, 16-25.

Online Etymology Dictionary, 2020.

Galois, É. Préface aux «Deux mémoires d’Analyse pure». St. Pélagie, December 1831.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Open Science Journal (OSJ) is multidisciplinary Open Access journal. We accept scientifically rigorous research, regardless of novelty. OSJ broad scope provides a platform to publish original research in all areas of sciences, including interdisciplinary and replication studies as well as negative results.