On the essence and ontology of systems
Abstract
In the first part of this research, publications were reviewed from 1968 to 2019, with the aim of observing how the definition of system has evolved, since it was established by Ludwig Von Bertalanffy. From this review it is concluded that this definition has not changed in essence, all the researchers consulted use concepts similar to those of Bertalanffy, when they propose a definition of system. However, according to the specific field of work, the authors add their own characteristics.
Bertalanffy's definition and all that have been derived from it postulate that a system is a conglomerate of interacting components. But after a brief reasoning it is concluded that everything in our universe meets that definition. A system is an atom, a cell, a chair, a galaxy, or the universe as a whole. So systems theory would be the theory of everything, which is too broad and imprecise.
Vagueness and imprecision have been eliminated when the concept of system has been applied to specific fields of knowledge and human activity and in each of them characteristics have been added that define more specifically the systems that are relevant to certain technical or scientific specialties. However, this has caused that many concepts developed in one field cannot be extended or used in others.
In this work, a system definition is established that allows us to clearly and precisely describe what these entities are and distinguish them from other concepts and entities. In this way it has been possible to characterize what a system is, using concepts that are applicable to any of the types of systems that can be found in our known world: natural systems, man-made systems and social systems.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Langlois R. (1983). SYSTEMS THEORY, KNOWLEDGE, AND THE SOCIAL SCIENCES. . In: Machlup, F., Mansfield, U. (Eds.), The Study of Information. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9664/4d45a67a23e66c327acbb0a70ada4f949333.pdf , 581 - 600.
Leighninger R. (1978). Systems 7eory. 5 (4).
Luhmann N. (1983). Insistence on Systems Theory: Perspectives from Germany-An Essay. Social Forces. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2578274. , 987-998.
Luhmann N. (June 1983). Insistence on Systems Theory: Perspectives from Germany-An Essay. Social Forces, 61 (4), 987 - 998.
Luhmann N. (1998). Social systems: Guidelines for a general theory. Barcelona, Spain: Anthropos Editorisl. Ruby.
Adams K. et al. (2014). Systems Theory as the Foundation for Understanding Systems. Systems Engineering .
Becht G. (1974). Systems Theory, The Key to Holism and Reductionism. BioScience,, 569 - 579.
Bertalanffy L. (1968). General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. New Tork: George Braziller.
Dori D. et al. (2019). System Definition, System Worldviews, and Systemness Characteristics. IEEE SYSTEMS JOURNAL .
Dori D. Sillito H. (2017). What is a System? An Ontological Framework. Systems Engineering .
McLoughlin J. and Webster J. (1970). Cybernetic and general-system approaches to urban and regional research: a review of the literature. Envaironment and Planning , 369 - 408.
Miller J. (1978). Living Systems. McGraw Hill Inc.
Miller J. (1986). Can Systems Theory Generate Testable Hypotheses ?: From Talcott Parsons to Living Systems Theory. Systems Research , 73-84.
Resconi G. (1986). A GENERAL SYSTEM LOGICAL THEORY. Int. J. General Svnems , 159-182 .
Rosen R. (1986). SOME COMMENTS ON SYSTEMS AND SYSTEM THEORY. International Journal of General Systems, 13 (1), 1 - 3.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.23954/osj.v5i3.2510
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Open Science Journal (OSJ) is multidisciplinary Open Access journal. We accept scientifically rigorous research, regardless of novelty. OSJ broad scope provides a platform to publish original research in all areas of sciences, including interdisciplinary and replication studies as well as negative results.