Climate Psychology: What is preventing the uptake in lifestyle changes that would significantly reduce one’s environmental impact?
Abstract
Human consumption and human emissions are rapidly destroying our home planet and the vital ingredients of life—the science is clear and abundant. And so, we need to make extreme changes in many aspects of life as quickly as possible—as a matter of survival. This paper explores the underlying mechanisms that prevent the public from making lifestyle changes that would significantly reduce their environmental impact. As part of the experiment, students were asked to complete the same anonymous survey. Before starting they were reminded that there is no right or wrong answer and that they should give their honest opinion. Perhaps the most reassuring of the findings was that over 90% of both UK and U.S. participants stated that they were concerned about the climate crisis and that they felt that it is important to make lifestyle changes to reduce harmful emissions, thus indicating a general awareness and motivation to take personal action. The most common reasons cited for not wanting to make a suggested lifestyle change were that the participant felt as though it is difficult to make the suggested change, and that the participant felt that the suggested change would not make a significant difference. Accordingly, the opposite statements were the most common reasons given for why the participants would consider making a suggested lifestyle change (it is easy to make the suggested change, and the participant felt that the suggested change would make a significant positive impact). The paper concludes by offering some ways in which we could facilitate the uptake in sustainable lifestyle choices.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Barragan RC, Dweck CS. 2014. Reciprocity triggers children's benevolence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111:(48) 17071-17074
doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1419408111
Brody N. Vangelisti AL. 2016. Bystander intervention in cyberbullying. Communication Monographs 83:(1) 94-119
doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2015.1044256
Cook J, Nuccitelli D, Green SA, Richardson M, Winkler B, Painting R, Way R, Jacobs P, Skuce A. 2013. Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environmental Research Letters 8:(2)
opscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024/meta
Cook J, Oreskes N, Doran PT, Anderegg WRL, Verheggen B, Maibach EW, Carlton JS, Lewandowsky S, Skuce AG, Green SA, Nuccitelli D, Jacobs P, Richardson M, Winkler B, Painting R, Rice K. 2016. Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming. Environmental Research Letters 11:(4)
doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002
Gifford. 2011. The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. American psychologist 66:(4) 290-302
doi.org/10.1037/a0023566
Hamlin JK, Wynn K, Bloom P. 2007. Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature 450:(7169) 557-559
doi.org/10.1038/nature06288
Hamlin JK, Wynn K. 2011. Young infants prefer prosocial to antisocial others. Cognitive development 26:(1) 30–39
doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2010.09.001
Koneswaran G, Nierenberg D. 2008. Global farm animal production and global warming: impacting and mitigating climate change. Environmental health perspectives 116(5): 578–582
doi.org/10.1289/ehp.11034
Latané B, Darley J. 1969. Bystander “Apathy”. American Scientist 57:(2) 244-268
jstor.org/stable/27828530
Machovina B, Feeley KJ, Ripple WJ. 2015. Biodiversity conservation: The key is reducing meat consumption. Science of Total Environment 536 419-431
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26231772
Plötner M, Over H, Carpenter M, Tomasello M. 2015. Young children show the bystander effect in helping situations. Psychological Science 499-506
doi.org/10.1177/0956797615569579
Poore J, Nemecek T. 2019. Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science 360:(6392) 987-992
doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq0216
SA. 2019. What causes ocean dead zones. Scientific American May 4
scientificamerican.com/article/ocean-dead-zones
Spence A, Poortinga W, Pidgeon N. 2012. The psychological distance of climate change.
Risk Analysis: An International Journal 32: (6) 957-972
doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01695.x
TVC. 2019. How much have you saved? TVC May 4
thevegancalculator.com/#calculator
UN. 2006. Livestock's Long Shadow: Environmental issues and options. United Nations: Food and Agriculture
fao.org/3/a0701e/a0701e00.htm
UN. 2015. Paris Agreement. The United Nations Dec 12
unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf
UN. 2018. Tackling the world's most urgent problem: meat. The United Nations Sep 26
unenvironment.org/news-and-stories/story/tackling-worlds-most-urgent-problem-meat
USGS. 2006. Pesticides in the Nation's Streams and Ground Water. USGS Mar
pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2006/3028
Valentine ME. 1980. The attenuating influence of gaze upon the bystander intervention effect. Journal of Social Psychology 111:(2) 197
psycnet.apa.org/record/1981-25777-001
Visser TAW, Roberts A. 2018. Automaticity of social cues: The influence of limiting cognitive resources on head orientation cueing, Scientific Reports 8:(10288)
nature.com/articles/s41598-018-28548-x
WAF. 2019. Animal agriculture causing animal extinction. The World Animal Foundation May 4
worldanimalfoundation.org/articles/article/8949042/186425.htm
Warneken F, Tomasello M. 2006. Altruistic Helping in Human Infants and Young Chimpanzees. Science 311:(5765) 1301-1303
doi.org/10.1126/science.1121448
DOI: https://doi.org/10.23954/osj.v5i3.2490
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Open Science Journal (OSJ) is multidisciplinary Open Access journal. We accept scientifically rigorous research, regardless of novelty. OSJ broad scope provides a platform to publish original research in all areas of sciences, including interdisciplinary and replication studies as well as negative results.