The medieval cultural and political origins of the industrial revolution
Abstract
This article argues that cultural and political legacies from the Middle Ages were crucial for the sustained economic growth that led to the Industrial Revolution. The medieval social/political orders had an exceptional openness to innovations (technological, organizational and institutional) when compared to other contemporary civilizations. Such openness was caused by the competition between them, as well as by the existence of multiple organizations independent from the State. The emergence of national states changed the medieval scenario but a legacy of some of its important cultural/institutional features remained and played a decisive role in the forthcoming Industrial Revolution: the Rule of Law, individualism, representative assemblies, the respect for labor and professions (notably the merchants) and the embryo of a culture of economic growth. Also, the legacy of a process of accumulation of capital, which was translated into a superior level of labor productivity when compared to those prevailing in any other civilization until that moment.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Acemoglu,D.and Robinson,J.A.(2012). Why Nations Fail. The Origens of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. New York: Crown Publishers. Kindle Edition.
Bloch,M.(1949). La société feodale. La formation des liens de dependence. Paris: Albin Michel.
Bloch,M.(1976). Les caractères originaux de l’histoire rurale française. Paris: Librairie Ar-mand Collin.
Boserup,E.(1970). Evolution agraire et pression démographique. Paris: Flammarion.
Braudel,F.(1979, tome 1). Les Structures du Quotidien. Civilisation materièlle, économie et capitalisme, XVème – XVIIIème siècles. Paris: Librairie Armand Collin.
Braudel,F.(1979, tome2). Les Jeux de l’Echange. Civilisation materièlle, économie et capita-lisme, XVème – XVIIIème siècles. Paris: Librairie Armand Collin.
Braudel,F.(1979, tome3). Les Temps du Monde. Civilisation materièlle, économie et capita-lisme, XVème – XVIIIème siècles. Paris: Librairie Armand Collin.
Dobb,M. (1974). Estudios sobre el Desarollo del Capitalismo. Siglo Veintiuno Argentina Editores S.A.
Dobb,M.(1972). “Replica”. In: Do feudalismo ao capitalismo. Lisboa: Publicações Don Quixote.
Dovring,F.(1965). “The transformation of European agriculture”. In: Habakkuk,H.J. and Postan,M.(ed.). The industrial revolution and after: income,population, and technological change (II). The Cambridge Economic History, Cambridge at the University Press.
Fukuyama,F.(2011). The Origins of Political Order. From Prehuman Times to the French Revolution. New York : Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Gies,F.&F. (1994).Cathedral, Forge, and Waterwheel. Technology and Invention in the Middle Ages. New york : Harper Collins Publishers.
Gimpel, J.(1975). La révolution industrielle au Moyen Age. Paris : Éditions du Seuil.
Goody,J.(1983). The Development of the Family and Marriage in Europe. New York : Cam-bridge University Press.
Greif,A.(2006). Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy. Lessons from Medieval Trade. Cambridge University Press. Kindle Edition.
Hajnal,J. (1965). European marriage patterns in perspective. In Population in History, ed. David Glass and D.E.C. Eversley. London : Edward Arnold.
Hobson,J.M.(2004). The Eastern Origins of Western Civilization. Cambridge University Press.
Jones,E.L.(1987). The European Miracle. Environments, economies and geopolitics in the history of Europe and Asia. Cambridge University Press.
Kula,W.(1979). Teoria econômica do Sistema feudal. Lisboa: Presença.
Landes,D.(1998). The Wealth and Poverty of Nations. New York: W.W.Norton & Company,Inc.
Laurent,R.(1976). “L’Utilisation du sol: la renovation des methods de culture”. In: Histoire Économique et Sociale de la France, Tome III, Vol. II. Paris: Presses Universitaires de la France.
Le Goff,J.(1990). “Le travail dans les systems de valeur de l’Occident medieval. In: Ha-messe,J. et Muraille-Samaran,C. (Ed.). Le Travail au Moyen Âge. Une approche interdiscipli-naire. Textes, Études, Congres, vol.10. IEM/Université Catholique de Louvain.
Lopez,R.(1976). The Commercial Revolution of the Middle Ages 950-1350. Cambridge University Press. Kindle Edition.
Mazoyer,M.(1977). “Evolution et differenciation des systems agricoles d’exploitation de la nature”. In: Les hommes et leurs sols, n.1 special du Journal d’Agriculture Tropicale et de Botanique Appliquée, v. 12/3, Avril/Septembre.
McCloskey, D. N. (2006). Bourgeois Virtues. Ethics for an Age of Commerce. The University of Chicago Press.
McCloskey, D.N. (2010). Bourgeois Dignity. Why economics can’t explain the modern world. The University of Chicago Press.
McCloskey, D.N. (2016). Bourgeois Equality. How ideas, not capital or institutions, enriched the world. The University of Chicago Press.
Mokyr,J.(1990). The Lever of Riches. Technological Creativity and Economic Progress. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
Mokyr,J. (2016). A Culture of Growth. The Origins of the Modern Economy. Princeton University Press.
Needham,J.(1969). The Grand Tritation. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
North,D. and Thomas,R.P.(1973). The Rise of the Western World. A New Economic History. Cambridge at the University Press
North,D.C.,Wallis,J.J.and Weingast,B.R.(2009). Violence and Social Orders. A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oxele,O.G.(1990). “Le Travail au XI siècle: réalités et mentalités”. In: Hamesse,J. et Muraille-Samaran,C. (Ed.). Le Travail au Moyen Âge. Une approche interdisciplinaire. Textes, Études, Congres, vol.10. IEM/Université Catholique de Louvain.
Olson,M.(2000). Power and Properity. Outgrowing capitalist and communist dictatorships. NY: Basic Books.
Parrain,C.(1944). “The Evolution of Agricultural Technique”. In: The Agrarian Life of Midle Ages. The Cambridge Economic History, Ed. By J.H. Claphannad E. Power, Cambridge University Press.
Pernoud,R.(1980). La femme au temps des Cathédrales. Paris: Éditions Stock.
Pomeranz,K.(2000). The Great Divergence. China, Europe, and the Making of the Modern World Economy. Princeton University Press.
Romeiro,A.R.(2017). História do Crescimento Economico. As Origens Político Culturais da Revolução Industrial. Texto para Discussão no. 312, IE/Unicamp.
Rosenberg,N.(1982). Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics. Cambridge Univer-sity Press.
Schachner,N.(1938). The medieval Universities. New York: Frederick A. Stokes. Apud Stark,R. (2014).pos.3081.
Sigaut,F.(1975). L’Agriculture et le Feu. Role et place du feu dans les techniques de preparation du champ de l’ancienne agriculture europeenne. Paris: EHESS et Mouton and Co.
Sigaut,F.(1977). “Quelques notions de base em matière de travail du sol dans les anciennes agricultures europeennes”. In: Les hommes et leurs sols, n.1 special du Journal d’Agriculture Tropicale et de Botanique Appliquée, v. 12/3, Avril/Septembre.
Slicher,Van Bath, B.H.(1966). The Agrarian History of Western Europe, A.D.500-1500. London: E. Arnold Publishers Ltd.
Stark,R.(2014). How the West Won. The Negleted Story of the Triumph of Modernity. Wilmington: ISI Books. Kindle Edition.
Sweezy,P.M.(1972). “Uma critica”. In: Do feudalismo ao capitalismo. Lisboa: Publicações Don Quixote.
Takahashi,H.K.(1972). “Uma contribuição para a discussão”. In: Do feudalismo ao capitalismo. Lisboa: Publicações Don Quixote.
Usher,A.P.(1954). A history of mechanical inventions. Harvard University Press.
Vilar,P.(1975). “A transição do feudalismo ao capitalismo”. In: Santiago, Theo A. (Org). Capitalismo, transição. Rio de Janeiro: Eldorado.
White,L.(1962). Medieval Technology and Social Change. Oxford University Press.
White.L.(1967). “The Historical Roots of four Ecological Crisis”. In: Science, 155.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.23954/osj.v5i2.2305
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Open Science Journal (OSJ) is multidisciplinary Open Access journal. We accept scientifically rigorous research, regardless of novelty. OSJ broad scope provides a platform to publish original research in all areas of sciences, including interdisciplinary and replication studies as well as negative results.