Money, a disconnecting agent: Reminders of money trigger a feeling of disconnection which increases the likelihood of unethical decisions.
Abstract
For eons many have hypothesized the corrupting influence of money, and yet, there has been a great void in the way of empirical experimentation. However, a series of pioneering experiments has begun to show confirmation of previous assumptions, one of which showed that the mere thought of money can loosen morals. This paper reveals three new experiments that explore the underlying process of this phenomenon. The results of experiments 1 and 2 suggest that individuals primed with money are less ethical than both a control group and individuals primed with business-related concepts. Further questioning revealed that an underlying mechanism behind the unethical decisions may be a decreased feeling of human connection. In accordance with this finding, the results of experiment 3 demonstrate that priming with disconnection themes directly results in a greater likelihood of unethical decisions.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Avalos H. 2005. Fighting Words: The Origins of Religious Violence. New York: Prometheus. 40
Bald M. 2014. Literature Suppressed on Religious Grounds. New York: Facts On File. 13
Blanco C, Grant J, Petry NM, Simpson HB, Alegria A, Liu SM, Hasin D. 2008. Prevalence and correlates of shoplifting in the United States: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC). Am J Psychiatry 165:(7) 905–13
Callero PL. 2013. The myth of individualism: how social forces shape our lives, 2nd edn. New York: Rowman & Littlefield. 29
Canto 12. The Bhūmi-gītā. Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, SB 12.3.41
Cordry HV. 2015. The Multicultural Dictionary of Proverbs. North Carolina: McFarland & Company. 179
Dibble BJ. 2012. Comprehending the Climate Crisis. Bloomington: iUniverse Inc. 79
Digha Nikaya 1. Brahmajāla Sutta. DN 1
Dreber A, Johannesson M. 2008. Gender differences in deception. Economics Letters, Elsevier 99:(1) 197–199
Ecclesiastes 5:10. The Holy Bible.
Ecclesiastes 5:13. The Holy Bible.
Franke GR, Crown DF, Spake DF. 1997. Gender differences in ethical perceptions of business practices: A social role theory perspective. The Journal of Applied Psychology 82: 920–934
Gandhi S S. 2007. History of Sikh Gurus Retold: 1469 - 1606. New Delhi: Atlantic Publishing. 187
Giddens A. 1990. The consequences of modernity. California: Stanford University Press.
Gino F, Pierce L. 2009. The abundance effect: Unethical behavior in the presence of wealth. Organizational Behaviour Human Decision Processes 109:(2) 142–155
Gino F, Mogilner C. 2014. Time, Money, and Morality. Psychological Science 25:(2) 414–421
Goodwin N, Nelson JA, Harris J. 2009. Macroeconomics in context. London: M. E. Sharpe. 387
Gorman EJ. 2008. Fire Mission. Illinois: Red Dessert Press. 161
Harari YN. 2014. Sapiens: A brief history of humankind. London: Vintage Books. 208
Jiang Y, Chen Z, Wyer SW. 2014. Impact of money on emotion expression. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 55, 228–233
Johns A, Slemrod J. 2010. The Distribution of Income Tax Noncompliance. National Tax Journal 63:(3) 397-418
Kay AC, Wheeler SC, Bargh JA, Ross L. 2004. Material priming: The influence of mundane physical objects on situational construal and competitive
behavioral choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 95: 83–96
Kets de Vries MFR. 2009. Sex, Money, Happiness, and Death: The Quest for Authenticity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 103
Kouchaki M, Smith-Crowe K, Brief AP, Sousa C. 2013. Seeing green: Mere exposure to money triggers a business decision frame and unethical outcomes. Organizational Behaviour Human Decision Processes 121:(1) 53-61
Kray LJ, Haselhuhn MP. 2012. Male pragmatism in negotiators’ ethical reasoning. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 48:(5) 1124-1131
Lewicki RJ, Robinson R. 1998. Ethical and unethical bargaining tactics: An empirical study. Journal of Business Ethics 17: 665–682
Marx K. 1844. The economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Matthew 19:24. The Holy Bible.
McCabe DL, Treviño LK. 1995. Cheating among business students: A challenge for business leaders and educators. The Journal of Management Education. 19:(2) 205–218
Mogilner C. 2010. The pursuit of happiness: Time, money, and social connection. Psychological Science 21: 1348–1354
Percy R, Timbs J, Limbird J. 1840. The mirror of literature, amusement, and instruction. London: J. Limbird. 156
Piff PK, Stancato DM, Côté S, Mendoza-Denton R, Keltner D. 2012. Higher social class predicts increased unethical behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109:(11) 4086–4091
Reutner L, Wänke M. 2013. For my own benefit or for the benefit of others: Reminders of money moderate the effects of self-related versus other-related persuasive arguments. Social Psychological and Personality Science 4: 220–223
Timothy 6:9. The Holy Bible.
Timothy 6:10. The Holy Bible.
Vohs KD, Mead NL, Goode MR. 2006. The psychological consequences of money. Science 314: 1154–1156
Vohs KD, Mead NL, Goode MR. 2008. Merely activating the concept of money changes personal and interpersonal behavior. Current Perspectives in Psychological Science 17:(3) 209
Vohs KD. 2015. Money Priming Can Change People's Thoughts, Feelings, Motivations, and Behaviors: An Update on 10 Years of Experiments. Journal of experimental psychology General 144:(4) e86-e93
Wang L, Malhotra D, Murnighan J K. 2011. Economics education and greed. The Academy of Management Learning and Education 10: 643–660
Wang L, Murnighan JK. 2014. Money, Emotions, and Ethics Across Individuals and Countries. Journal of Business Ethics 125: 163
DOI: https://doi.org/10.23954/osj.v4i1.2200
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Open Science Journal (OSJ) is multidisciplinary Open Access journal. We accept scientifically rigorous research, regardless of novelty. OSJ broad scope provides a platform to publish original research in all areas of sciences, including interdisciplinary and replication studies as well as negative results.